🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the UK, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. As time has passed, an observance that was initiated as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between international African diaspora communities, has developed a business-like atmosphere, broadening to incorporate functions where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to address white audiences about implicit prejudice and active solidarity. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s created a surge in the enterprise of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The surge has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Background of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the second week of February. Black History Month developed from this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the North America in the second month, but also in autumn in the Britain, Deutschland, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The period has developed since those days, placing less emphasis on the accounts of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and more on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with lectures and artistic activities. But the way the celebration is commemorated is a reflection of the political moment. How it progresses is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to erosion: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to tackle structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Troubling Time

Few things illustrate how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the UK, a revitalized conservative movement in the shape of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we witnessed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a legislator feels empowered to declare that the absence of Caucasian individuals in certain urban areas is a source of worry. At the same time, far-right parties are surging in the EU as a entirety.

In the United States, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been brought, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the nation. A drive to erase Black history and narrative from the records is ongoing. One of Donald Trump's first executive orders targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to change the national past” by depicting the United States “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the observance represents how little it can be impactful if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content commemorations of contributions in the past, rather than challenging the situation of the present. It also reveals how its short period means that it is separated from the more extensive continuous action that is required. A university professor, a prof at an educational institution, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The difficulty with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden actions for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just do away with things like Black History Month completely, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an era that has failed to deliver.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and heritage of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an infrastructure that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as some institutions are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not avoid politics, and leaves space for citizens, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is mere awareness of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Establishments who mark it should not be reassured with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and alertness to subtle slights, but challenged by the threats that face all if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and adaptive. It could be that an complete renaming is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.